I.R.C. imposes 40% excise tax on certain high cost employer-sponsored health care plans

My friend April sent me an email about the Title IX: Revenue Provisions in the Health Care Bill that was passed. I was surprised at what she referred to so I went to the website, http://thomas.gov and searched for HR 3590 summary.

What I wanted was on pages 21-22 of the summary. I bet you’ll be as surprised as I was. Here is a summary of the summary.

Subtitle A: Revenue Offset Provisions – (Sec. 9001, as modified by section 10901) Amends the Internal Revenue Code to impose an excise tax of 40% of the excess benefit from certain high cost employer-sponsored health coverage. Any amount which exceeds payment of $8,500 for an employee self-only coverage plan and $23,000 for employees with other than self-only coverage (family plans) as an excess benefit. Increases such amounts for certain retirees and employees who are engaged in high-risk professions (e.g., law enforcement officers, emergency medical first responders, or longshore workers). Imposes a penalty on employers and coverage providers for failure to calculate the proper amount of an excess benefit.

As I understand this, if you are in a company plan and the company pays over $8,500 for a single individual employee that employee will be paying tax on the amount over $8,500 at 40%. Example: Company pays $10,000 for individual employee health coverage. Deduct $8,500 leaving $1,500 excess. Employee will have to pay $600 excise tax on the $1,500 calculated at 40%.

The employee that insures a family will have to pay the excise tax on the amount over $23,000 that the company pays. Example: Company pays $30,000 for a family plan. Deduct $23,000 leaving $7,000 excess. Employee will have to pay $2,800 excise tax on the $7,000 calculated at 40%.

(Sec.9002) Requires employers to include in the W-2 form the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employee’s gross income (excluding the value of contributions to flexible spending arrangements).

I don’t know if these plans apply to the average employee or to high earning executives. I guess we’ll find out when W-2s come out in 2011.

There are some other sections that relate to health savings account, Archer medical savings account, limits of annual salary reduction contributions under a cafeteria plan, etc.

Asset Based Long-Term Care Insurance: Blog Radio Show 4/16/2010

5 LAWS OF STRATOSPHERIC SUCCESS

I’ve been reading the The Go-Giver and The Go-Givers Sell More by Bob Burg and John David Mann. I’ve always been a Giver. After reading these two books I realize that sometimes I’ve done the giving with an expectation of receiving something in return. I realize now that has actually not been beneficial to me.

I want to share the 5 Laws of Stratospher Success on page 9 of Go-Givers Sell More and recommend the book to you.

The Law of Value: Your true worth is determined by how much more you give in value than you take in payment.

The Law of Compensation: Your income is determined by how many people you serve and how well you serve them.

The Law of Influence: Your influence is determined by how abundantly you place other people’s interests first.

The Law of Authenticity: The most valuable gift you have to offer is yourself.

The Law of Receptivity: The key to effective giving is to stay open to receiving.

Feel free to comment. You can always reach me by phone at 818 706-3745 or email: Sandra@Insurance-California.com

Sandra Cherry, PFP www.SandraCherryFinancialPlanner.com 818 706-3745

Insurance–Options for Long-term care benefits

This past week I learned about a Whole Life Insurance Policy that has Long-term care benefits. The company that provides the policy is reputable so I phoned them to find out about it.

What I learned is that it is a single premium product with simple underwriting. After applying the insured receives a phone call from an Underwriter and is asked a few questions. The benefits can be used at home or Assisted Living or Skilled Nursing and there is a 90-day elimination period before the policy pays benefits. The minimum premium is $50,000.

This company also has a Universal Life Insurance Policy that the insured can add a rider to that provides Long-term care benefits. It’s a different scenario since the premium is paid over time.

Over the years I have written annuities with Long-term care benefits for clients who had health issues and would not qualify for pure Long-term Care Insurance. Annuities also require a single premium with minimal underwriting. One company has a 7-day elimination period. Far better than waiting 90-days for the insurance carrier to start paying.

The advantage to both Life Insurance and Annuities with Long-term care benefits is that whether it is used for Long-term care or not the beneficiary will receive the money not used when the insured/annuitant dies.

Call me at 818 706-3745 or email: Sandra@Insurance-California.com if you would like to discuss the possibility of obtaining quotes for yourself or a loved one.

Sandra Cherry, PFP CA Insurance License #0B45111

SandraCherryFinancialPlanner.com

HOW TO DECIDE IF YOU WANT TO RETAIN A MORTGAGE–CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

Last week my client, LM, and I met for the second time with my associate Michael Hunter of MJHunter in Thousand Oaks. LM is 62, has $1 million in CDs, no credit card debt and no car payments. One of her concerns is whether or not she should maintain the mortgage she refinanced about 6 years ago or pay it off.

First, we prepared a cash flow analysis to calculate how long LM’s $1 million in savings will last based on her lifestyle, current expenses and an estimated life span of another 30 years. Then we made adjustments to the analysis to determine if it makes sense for LM to pay off her mortgage.

While the mortgage rate is adjustable over the next 23 years, the actual cost of the mortgage is 10%. This rate is determined by taking the actual mortgage balance of $141,000 divided by the amount of annual payments ($14,000). The question we have to ask is: if LM pays off the mortgage, how much will it actually cost her in loss of income? The answer is very little, because the money she would use to pay off the mortgage is earning less than 1%.

Our second cash flow analysis, which had the mortgage paid off and an estimated return on investments averaging 5%, showed that LM’s principal would last beyond 30 years and leave a small sum for her heirs.

Because LM doesn’t have any income other than what her CDs are earning in interest, we need to reconfigure her investments to earn a higher return so she won’t run out of money. Michael and I will meet again this week to brainstorm about investments that would generate this target income of 5%, as well as be appropriate for LM’s risk tolerance and time horizon.

In the meantime, LM is very happy about the idea of turning $141,000 of debt into equity in her home.

Until next time……………………Sandra